
Vendor Profile
Osaka University Press
Address | Osaka University West Front Ymadaoka2-7 Suita-shi Osaka, JAPAN ZIP:565-0871 |
---|---|
Representative Name | MITSUNARI KENJI |
Annual Revenue | closed |
No. of Employees | 7 |
Web Site URL | |
SNS |
SD item code:12310664
Detail | Price & Quantity | ||
---|---|---|---|
S1 |
Judicial Use in Traditional Societies: Possibilities for East-West Comparison
![]()
伝統社会の司法利用:東西比較の可能性
(978-4-87259-793-6)
|
(978-4-87259-793-6)
Wholesale Price: Members Only
1 pc /set
In Stock
|
Shipping Date |
---|
About 10 days
|
Dimensions |
---|
A5 size, 354 pages
|
Specifications |
---|
Country of manufacture: Japan
Material / component: Paper
Package: Individual Packaging
Year of manufacture: 2024
Product tag: None
|
Description
Edited by Naoko Matsumoto / Written by Shigeko Kobayashi, Gakujin Takamura, Tohen Chen, Martin*Dinges, Hiroaki Terada, So Nakatani, Makiko Hayashi, Karl Härter, Hoshi Maeda, Susanne Lepsius [Justiznutzung (Use of Justice) is a concept proposed by the German early modern historian M. Dinges, and is a working concept that focuses on the behavior of residents in choosing and using various means of public dispute resolution, not limited to the courts. Based on this concept, which allows for an analysis that does not use the [modern sense of rights] as a central criterion, we will compare the actual situation and background of various public dispute resolutions in traditional societies in the East and the West. |
More
Shipping Method | Estimated Arrival |
---|---|
Sea Mail | From Nov.7th 2025 to Jan.9th 2026 |
Air Mail | From Oct.22nd 2025 to Oct.24th 2025 |
EMS | From Oct.21st 2025 to Oct.24th 2025 |
Pantos Express | From Oct.23rd 2025 to Oct.28th 2025 |
DHL | From Oct.21st 2025 to Oct.23rd 2025 |
UPS | From Oct.21st 2025 to Oct.23rd 2025 |
FedEx | From Oct.21st 2025 to Oct.23rd 2025 |
Some trading conditions may be applicable only in Japan. |
People Also Searched:
Book
[Justiznutzung (Use of Justice) is a concept proposed by the German early modern historian M. Dinges, and is a working concept that focuses on the behavior of residents in choosing and using various means of public dispute resolution, not limited to the courts. Based on this concept, which allows for an analysis that does not use the [modern sense of rights] as a central criterion, we will compare the actual situation and background of various public dispute resolutions in traditional societies in the East and the West.