Vendor Profile
Osaka University Press
| Address | Osaka University West Front Ymadaoka2-7 Suita-shi Osaka, JAPAN ZIP:565-0871 |
|---|---|
| Representative Name | MITSUNARI KENJI |
| Annual Revenue | closed |
| No. of Employees | 7 |
| Web Site URL | |
| SNS |
SD item code:10219208
| Detail | Price & Quantity | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| S1 |
Long-Term Care Services and the Market Principle: The Dilemma of Efficiency * Quality and Civil Society
 Original text before translation
介護サービスと市場原理—効率化・質と市民社会のジレンマ
(978-4-87259-744-8)
|
(978-4-87259-744-8)
Wholesale Price: Members Only
1 pc /set
In Stock
|
|
| Shipping Date |
|---|
|
About 10 days
|
| Dimensions |
|---|
|
A5 size, 266 pages
|
| Specifications |
|---|
|
Country of manufacture: Japan
Material / component: Paper
Package: Individual Packaging
Year of manufacture: 2022
Product tag: None
|
Description
| By Nobuko Kanaya The long-term care insurance system enacted in April 2000 introduced a quasi-market system in which a variety of public, non-profit, and for-profit providers compete with each other in order to efficiently supply high-quality long-term care services. This book analyzes and shows the behavior of non-profit and for-profit organizations from the introduction of the long-term care insurance service business in Japan more than 20 years ago until recently. What indicators can be used to compare and determine what is a good long-term care service for users? What are the differences and factors in the quality of services provided by for-profit corporations and non-profit corporations, which are difficult to treat as a single category, when viewed by market and management entity with regional differences? Also, is there cream-skimming oriented behavior occurring among providers? What factors affect the number of users? The report clarifies the relationship between multiple factors and service quality, and presents the advantages and disadvantages of increased efficiency and the outlook for the long-term care services market. The report also analyzes the significance of maintaining fairness* to users and not compromising the quality of services amidst the expansion of operators' profits, as well as the significance of protecting the working environment of nursing care workers. The research results should be used as a reference for the field to see how the system of competition between non-profit and for-profit organizations has functioned in the public service that is the long-term care insurance system. |
More
| Shipping Method | Estimated Arrival |
|---|---|
| Sea Mail | From Nov.11th 2025 to Jan.13th 2026 |
| Air Mail | From Oct.24th 2025 to Oct.28th 2025 |
| EMS | From Oct.23rd 2025 to Oct.28th 2025 |
| Pantos Express | From Oct.27th 2025 to Oct.30th 2025 |
| DHL | From Oct.23rd 2025 to Oct.27th 2025 |
| UPS | From Oct.23rd 2025 to Oct.27th 2025 |
| FedEx | From Oct.23rd 2025 to Oct.27th 2025 |
|
Some trading conditions may be applicable only in Japan. |
People Also Searched:
BookOther items from this category:
The long-term care insurance system enacted in April 2000 introduced a quasi-market system in which a variety of public, non-profit, and for-profit providers compete with each other in order to efficiently supply high-quality long-term care services.
This book analyzes and shows the behavior of non-profit and for-profit organizations from the introduction of the long-term care insurance service business in Japan more than 20 years ago until recently. What indicators can be used to compare and determine what is a good long-term care service for users? What are the differences and factors in the quality of services provided by for-profit corporations and non-profit corporations, which are difficult to treat as a single category, when viewed by market and management entity with regional differences? Also, is there cream-skimming oriented behavior occurring among providers? What factors affect the number of users? The report clarifies the relationship between multiple factors and service quality, and presents the advantages and disadvantages of increased efficiency and the outlook for the long-term care services market. The report also analyzes the significance of maintaining fairness* to users and not compromising the quality of services amidst the expansion of operators' profits, as well as the significance of protecting the working environment of nursing care workers.
The research results should be used as a reference for the field to see how the system of competition between non-profit and for-profit organizations has functioned in the public service that is the long-term care insurance system.